So what I’m hearing is that we just need to selectively breed people to have smaller penises so we can just use chicken intestines for condoms instead?
So what I’m hearing is that we just need to selectively breed people to have smaller penises so we can just use chicken intestines for condoms instead?
I don’t think so. But I think that that’s going to vary a lot based on how you want to measure “badness for the climate”.
My instinct is to look at Feed to Gain Ratio, which is the measure of food eaten to weight gained. This will vary animal to animal based on the animal’s purpose (meat cows vs dairy cows, meat lambs vs wool sheep, etc) and the type of food they’re fed.
Still, there are reliable bands for estimating for each animal. According to This Article, it looks like sheep can fall into a 4:1 to 6:1 ratio while cows are closer to 12:1 (this is a bit higher than I was taught in high school biology, but not by much). Of course, the higher these numbers, the “worse” the animal is for the environment.
This, but un-sarcastically.
Would be an interesting boost to the Sheep industry.
Sorry, was definitely reading this 90% asleep as I rolled out of bed. Thanks for the extra link anyway.
Can you pass a link?
They asked if I had a degree in theoretical physics.
I said I have a theoretical degree in physics.
They said welcome aboard.
Yeah, those ones want to spend 40 of them with you though.
Oh no, now we have to ban them all?? What a shame!
/s