All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
If this is a legitimate test, note that there is a community specifically for this purpose: !test@lemmy.ml.
I upgraded from 8GB to 16GB like 2 months ago.
When I use a website as a source, at the time that I access it for information, I will also save a snapshot of it in the Wayback Machine. Ofc theres no guarantee that the Internet Archive will be able to survive, but the likelihood of that is probably far greater than some random website. So, if the link dies, one can still see it in the Wayback Machine. This also has the added benefit of locking in time what the source looked like when it was accessed (assuming one timestamps when they access the source when they cite it).
gestures passionately “Download Lemmy!”
I’m feeling warm and fuzzy for some reason.
deleted by creator
Those are legally binding.
That’s a fair point. Though, it would depend on exactly what it says in the privacy policy (I have not looked). The data of the mood entries themselves might not leave the device, but perhaps they still record your general usage of the app for targeted ads.
Fair point. I believe I was under the impression that this was an app rather than a served webpage. I suppose one can easily verify this by looking at how the “For You” algorithm works within the browser — all the code for functionality would be sent to the browser; though, it could potentially be obfuscated, which might be a pain.
You’re technically right, but I’d much prefer to use software designed with privacy as intent. At the very least, it’s much more convenient.
Are you looking for something for a headless server or something for a system with a GUI (eg a desktop)?
Without it being open source and not providing reproducible builds, the privacy claims are borderline weightless.
There’s already an issue open for this.
As of 2024-09-03T22:10:25.545Z, Starlink is now complying with Brazil’s X ban [1].
References