• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • I have been using custom start menus since the whole win8 full screen disaster. Every time I see the default win 10 or Win 11 menu I cringe. So much crap in the way.

    Process optimization reaches a point of diminishing returns. Then if tweaked further it degrades the performance. Microsoft reached the close to the optimal OS design at Win7. It’s all been downhill since then.

    The mobile OS systems are reaching the same point. Optimization has occured and most of the “new” additions degrade the user experience.


  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyz2 Kinds
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    After much debate over copious drinks at the bar, we finally decided to settle the argument with darts.

    0 are all crossed.

    1’s are written as l

    7’s are all crossed.

    And 9’s… Well we got kicked out and it was never settled. How was I supposed to know the nickname Nicky sounds like the French word “Niquer” and somebody (Nicolas) got all bent out of shape over it. “Hey Nicky it’s your turn!” apparently was not well received by a drunk frenchman.




  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzPhD Grads
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    No - you missed my direction.

    The paragraph is an overly polite way of writing to avoid any semblance of disparaging the other person. As mine was clearly written as a personal anecdote there is no need to qualify your remarks as non-derogatory.

    Generally I see people develop those types of phrasing habits when they have negative experiences with misunderstanding in the past. Very common with many PhD’s communicating with MBA’s, sales or production teams. A little overly verbose but carefullly respectful to avoid conflict. It’s a very good habit to have professionally but quite funny when out of context.


  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzPhD Grads
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    First paragraph had me laughing. Somebody has spent a lot of time in private industry and has gotten burned a few times.

    As for #2 it depends on the age of the industry. Here is the life cycle of research driven industries as I see it.

    Historically in research driven industries the foundations have been started in academia. Private companies start up relying on the universities research.

    Money flows into the university systems from private companies and they start producing a lot PhD’s in the field.

    Next the private companies decide they can make more money doing the research in-house. They offer large sums of money to the established professors and get fresh grads at bargain prices.

    Pretty soon most of the best and brightest are drained to private industry. The funding from private industry slows to a trickle and all that is left in academia is those with more social connections than ability.

    For the next 30 years, private industry has great talent. Then the first first wave of PhD’s retire. The new PhD’s grads are trained by the social connections crowd.

    That’s when you start to see fun job descriptions posted like:

    PhD + 2 years of experience, Masters + 5 years experience, Bachelor’s + 8 years experience.


  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzPhD Grads
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 days ago

    I spent most of a decade in industry doing what is generally thought of as a PhD’s job. In order to fill in some gaps, I took a ton of graduate classes on the companies dime and looked at doing a fully funded PhD. I didn’t end up doing it.

    Why?

    1. The industry paid better than academia. So the brain drain was real. The informal training I had from PhD’s in the company was vastly superior to the graduate level training at the university. Anyone who was any good at the applied side was not in academia. The ones left in academia were a very odd group with zero applied knowledge.

    2. Most PhD hires failed miserably in the field. 9 out of 10 of them could not make the transition to the practical application of knowledge.

    3. I saw a trend where smaller companies where hiring mostly industry experienced people for the positions (like I was).

    So for me the time and investment was not worth it.

    One of my friends made it halfway through his PhD. He then got sick of the politics and drama and noped out.


  • My undergrad biochemistry course was taught team taught by a microbiologist and a molecular biologist because the biochemist got fired for sexually harassing a few students.

    The molecular biologist was a cool guy and taught concepts. I got an easy A in that section.

    The next few weeks were taught by the microbiologist. That asshole wanted us to memorize a ton of different pathways on our second midterm (cyclic acid, fermentations, photosynthetic, MAPK etc…). Something like 20 total. I took an F on that one.

    Luckily the final was a standardize test that all universities in the state used that year. So I ended up with a B.






  • Why is basic math.

    In a made up scenario let’s start with a dumb 50"ish TV. That cost them around $100 to build. Add in another $50 for shipping and distribution fees. It’s at the store for $150 cost. If they set the price at $400. There is $250 dollars of profit to share between the store and the manufacturer. The manufactuerer likely gets under $100.

    Now for a smart TV the revenue stream looks different. First their costs only go up by a few dollars for adding the “smart” chips. So let’s say $155 cost. Then they collect revenue from the streaming providers to be supported by their smart TV say $30 per set. Then they collect the $20 per set per year in user data collected. So if they price the smart TV the same as the dumb one they generate $95 from the sale of the set.

    So the profit from a dumb TV is $100 at he point of sale.

    The profit from a smart TV is $225+ in a constant revenue stream over 5 years.

    And this is why we see so much advertising for smart TV’s as being the best thing.


  • Airborne respiratory viruses in humans tend to decrease in lethality. This doesn’t really transfer anywhere else. The decrease in severity in is due to selection pressure from human quarantine behavior.

    Killing the host is normal in single celled organisms. The most common method viruses leave the cell I by causing it to burst open.

    Killing the host is also common in the plant world.



  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzchoosing violence
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    They really don’t care where the nutrients come from. However they take very little to keep going for a long time.

    Cell biologist I worked with tested tested this one.

    He placed 10 small plants into sterile agar made with diluted Hoagland’s solution. He then sealed the petri dishes with petrifilm (gas permeable). Then placed them under a low light (4 T12’s at 20cm and a 12 hour photoperiod).

    He started them about 5 years before I met him. We worked together for 11 years and he never lost a plant.