not yet, they haven’t.
not yet, they haven’t.
without search and their abuse of that monopoly, google wouldn’t have dominant positions or massive market shares that many of their other properties (products, services, software, etc) have.
probably not very many because it only took a single psychotic new owner to do that when he started pulling servers out of a sacramento data center a couple years back, with no engineering and no planning.
so, basically, the os isn’t tuned for the new chips yet.
the 2nd threads on smt-enabled cores are supposed to get hit last.
depends on when it hits the supreme court, for sure.
didn’t someone just say google was ‘very bad’ and should be ‘shut down’? …someone that helped stack the court to its current composition?
i’ve got a few using the mv3 ‘lite’ version of ubo here. seems to be sufficient–for now.
they’re trying, with that ‘privacy’ sandbox crap.
i read that as more like “nobody would opt in if it was opt-in”.
when it automatically enables on win11 home, it doesn’t actually “enable” until you do sign-in to windows with a microsoft account so it has a place to stash the recovery key.
and, i have not had any difficulty turning the encryption off on win11 home systems.